cZDrDfNiy
Okay, second pgrparaah, Romer tries to compare unemployment numbers of 8.1% and 25%. Is that really true? Do we not count unemployment differently than we did in the 30s? I really don't think this is a fair comparison. If we used the old calculation wouldn't unemployment be closer to 20% and definitely not improving like the government wants us to believe.Oh, and now she's comparing GDP numbers, and you know my feelings on GDP! And why compare GDP numbers from the boom to the bust? The boom was an artificial economy anyway, so everything was distorted. The recession is when the world rebalances the imbalances that occurred during the boom. I don't understand why Keynesians have such a problem with people increasing their savings during a recession. If you lost your job, wouldn't you have to cut your expenses and rethink your spending strategies? Why does this thinking change when we talk about countries? Logically it makes no sense to me Yaacov, the other thing is that the economy is a very, very, very complex creature. Every transaction plays a role, and for every transaction that does occur, there are countless other transactions that could have occurred if it didn't. I suppose you think a broken window is a good thing because it stimulates the economy. But logically this makes no sense, because something was destroyed. Sure the window owner now has to spend money to repair it, and the window maker now has more money to spend, etc, etc. But on the other hand, if that window owner didn't have to replace the window they could have spent the money on something else. Destroying something is not productive for society. If that were the case we could employ half of society digging ditches, and the other half filling them in. Sometimes as economists we need to think about things logically and stop looking at the numbers. by Neeraja posted on Monday, April 23, 2012

aOYVWjWdWqCU
a7sQR6 ixjnlovgewwi by nbnfmufcag posted on Tuesday, April 24, 2012

DGkvIglgO
“Now if only GO would invest some serious money into upgrading the tracks to allow for faster speeds (hopefully up to 160km/h west of Brampton) to allow trip times of less than an hour. Currently it takes 1 hour 36 minutes by VIA and about the same (depending on traffic) by Greyhound, and the GO train will take more like 2 hours because it makes more stops. Doing this will make the train much more competitive with driving or the bus. This is needed on Peterborough as well if it is ever upgraded, otherwise it is faster to take the bus.”Upgrading to 160 km/h would involve some hefty investment in curves and signalling. I doubt that the trains would run local all the way from Kitchener to Union. They would be hauling too many empty seats for too many miles to make it worth while. I bet that they will run express from Bramalea to Toronto with a local coming out just after them.James says:November 14, 2010 at 8:57 pm“Something missing here, I think, is the need for the province to step and contract with VIA to provide service where desired. Several U.S. States have done this with Amtrak, using it to provide commuter or student-friendly or tourist rail services that were not commercially viable or federally subsidized.”I think that GO/MetroLinx is providing the type and level of service that the Province wants and are doing it for a lot less subsidy the VIA would require. Can you imagine a VIA train loading 700 people at an intermediate station. It would take hours through the two doors that they would have open. I have watched a VIA train take 10 minutes to load 50 passengers then have a GO train come in and load 700 in 2 minutes. Lets keep VIA as far away from the commuter game as possible. While GO has trouble thinking anything other than FRA TC compatible equipment, at least they look at different designs.If GO/MetroLinx wanted to increase their average speed to something approaching electric locomotive hauled trains they could run AC locomotives and put one at either end. AC has an initial tractive effort of 30 – 45% higher than DC and using two locomotives would double that. You would end up with initial acceleration rates of 260 to 290% of today’s. That would improve speed a lot more than increasing the maximum speed. Look at the amount of time that the train spends accelerating versus running at 160 km/h in commuter service. GO will not do that because the cost for the locomotives would be very high, but the operating cost would probably be similar, higher fuel versus lower wages due to time saved. levitra acyclovir cheap online by Dorie posted on Thursday, April 26, 2012

bZuXMjUbfkcMfj
I’ve been following this story for some time. The storage facility is likely a pair of tracks to be built by the mainline in west Kitchener, just west of Ira Needles Blvd. There’s plenty of space there, although some residents a few hundred metres away are understandably nervous. Given that they’re only talking about $18 million in investment, I think GO’s doing this on the cheap on the theory that it’s more important to get the service in and improve it over time than to go with the gold standard right away. $18 million is not enough to build the hoped-for new station at King and Victoria, and that was probably a side-project for the Waterloo Regional LRT in any event. I expect they’ll re-use the VIA stations in Kitchener and Guelph (the latter of which is due to be renovated and combined with the intercity bus terminal, and possibly the local bus terminal as well. A stop has been promised in Acton, and I expect they’ll simply resurrect the stop next to the Old Hyde House. I suspect they may take two established runs from Georgetown and extend them to start out and finish in Kitchener.For me, the big question mark is Breslau. The proposed stop is in the middle of a farmer’s field, so it could be covered under the $18 million, but I’m not sure. It’s not mentioned in the press release. Breslau is basically where Kitchener would come to park. Right now, parking is quite limited at the VIA Rail stop.$18 million also isn’t much for track improvements, including the slow-order bridge over the Grand River. But I keep on hearing that funding is already available for VIA to make track improvements, assuming they can reach some sort of deal with the rather intransigent Goderich and Exeter Railway which leases the line (from CN). auto insurance quotes state auto insurance by Dweezil posted on Wednesday, May 02, 2012

IZsWozUMTDM
Steve: One huge annoyance of the VIA schedules and the small number of trains is that a perfect market for students to the many universities along the line (London, K-W, Guelph, not to mention Toronto) is not served because there are not enough trains and their schedules suit the railway, not the passengers.In its current state, VIA is totally unsuitable for students for a few major reasons:- A return fare costs about $45, and requires an ISIC card, which is a hassle to get (they don’t accept regular university student cards).- The schedule at Kitchener is so infrequent that if you miss your train, you may have to wait until the next day, and it’s impossible to have a flexible schedule.- The Kitchener station is not easily accessible from the universities. There’s no reason students would take the VIA train when Greyhound is much cheaper ($25 return fare), the buses run every hour at peak time, the travel time is about the same, and the buses are easier to access than the train station. During peak hours Greyhound buses even stop at the universities, and off-peak they stop at the bus terminal. And Greyhound tickets are transferable – you can use them at any date or time before they expire (3 months), unlike VIA tickets which are only valid on a particular date and time. So if you happen to catch a ride with someone else, you can still use your Greyhound ticket the following weekend. online car insurance insurance auto auctions by Blaze posted on Saturday, May 12, 2012